Viability of the UIGEA
Saturday, April 12th, 2008Viability of the UIGEA
April 2, 2008 marked the Congressional hearings into the viability of the existing Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA). The hearing was entitled “Proposed UIGEA Regulations: Burden Without Benefit?” and was conducted by the House Committee on Financial Service’s and the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade, and Technology.
A phenomenal amount of media coverage has been broadcast as delegates listened to all the reasons why the law has been daubed too ambiguous. This in effect, makes it very difficult to efficiently provide regulations for the UIGEA.
One of the points that emerged from Federal Reserve and Treasury officials is that federal law is unclear as to what type of gambling is illegal on the Internet (online).”One of the most common complaints is that the proposed rules fail to sufficiently define key terms, leaving financial institutions with significant compliance difficulties” said Chairman of the Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Congressman Luis Gutierrez. He explained by saying: “For example, the regulation fails to adequately define what constitutes ‘unlawful Internet gambling’ or a ‘restricted transaction’, yet requires the financial institutions to make a determination on their own about what is lawful or unlawful”.
According to the Congressman, this will place consumers at risk of having their lawful transactions blocked. He emphasizes that it is easy to see exactly how these regulations could cause chaos on electronic commerce in the United States if they are implemented in their current form.
UIGEA came into effect late 2006 and has seen many complaints from both banks and gaming companies. The hearing gave some hope, but the true outcome has still to be seen.
